ZOO editions

The ZOO will be distributed as Pro and Lite Edition

Mar
16

Today we like to give you a quick update on how the upcoming ZOO extension will be distributed. The ZOO will be released in two editions: The Lite Edition and the Pro Edition.

The Lite Edition will be will be available as a free download for everybody. The Pro Edition will be available as a commercial extension. You can purchase a single license for 99€. A single license means you can install the ZOO in one Joomla installation. The single ZOO license gives you access to the YOOtheme member area with downloads, updates and the forum for 3 months.

The Pro Edition offers additional features like professional catalog templates and a bigger set of elements. Usually each of your catalogs serves a certain purpose, for example a product directory, a blog or a download archive. Basically all catalog-like applications can be implemented by using the ZOO extension. In the future we will add a couple of more templates to the Pro Edition to cover most common uses. All these bundled templates are ready to use. That means, with the ZOO Pro Edition you are only a few clicks away from getting your new catalog online without worrying too much about templating.

In case you run a blog and want to write a review of our ZOO extension, feel free to drop us a email. In the release week we will give away a limited number of the ZOO Pro Edition for this purpose.

The ZOO extension will be released shortly. We are just finishing the last items of our todo list.

By Steffan | | Posted in ZOO

Comments (106)

  • Maybe I'm misunderstanding the use of the term "license". Aren't you releasing this under the GPL? If so, can you really dictate that it can only be used in one Joomla installation? Just curious. Looking forward to the stable release! :)
    • Nate

      Nate

      |
      im assuming the gpl part comes under allowing others to edit the code, i.e. not closed source. Not an expert tho
      • Actually, by distributing the code under the GPL, you allow the person to whom you are distributing the code to redistribute it or use it however they see fit as long as they also abide by the GPL. That's why I'm a bit confused by the idea of a single site license for code that is released under the GPL. Maybe I was mistaken. Maybe Zoo will not be GPL.
    • steffan

      steffan

      | Profile |
      The ZOO extension is released under GPL and the component core itself is fully functional and distributed free in the Lite Edition. The license applies to the additional templates designed for the ZOO Pro Edition.
      • Thanks for the clarification, Steffan. http://twitter.com/AmyStephen/status/1354528134 It has been pointed out to me that my previous question/comment seemed like I was pressuring YooTheme regarding the licensing of Zoo. I just want you to know that my intent was not to pressure you, but to seek clarification. I am very interested in Zoo, because it is a much-needed extension in the community. Thanks for all of your effort in developing this extension, and for releasing it under the GPL.
  • Sentinel

    Sentinel

    |
    What's about the YOOtheme members?
  • Mark

    Mark

    |
    I agree with Sentinel - What about the YOOtheme members?
    Any discount or a special package for being an existing YOOTheme Member?
  • ziohenry

    ziohenry

    | Profile |
    I agree with Sentinel and Mark! I've just buy a Gold Subscription! What about us?
  • Sargon

    Sargon

    |
    For Pro Edition Licenses what happens after the 3 month period if updates are needed? Are they available or do they require a new license? Do current YooTheme members have access to Updates (realize license is still needed).
  • tjaard.heikens

    tjaard.heikens

    | Profile |
    On this site is stated for the Platinum membership:

    The Platinum membership license gives you the right to use any templates or any other products on unlimited sites. You are authorized to use any templates or products for clients/3rd parties. The platinum membership expires after 12 months.

    So I presume that the ZOO extension is part of this contract.

    Hope to hear soon about this issue!
    • steffan

      steffan

      | Profile |
      The ZOO extension will be distributed with its own subscription model, separate from the YOOtheme template club. The platinum licenses only applies to the template club subscription for templates and YOOtools module/plugins.
  • CoolCactus

    CoolCactus

    |
    Are there any examples of membership clubs out there that develop items for their members then when they come up with an exceptional item (as we believe that Zoo is) decide not to make it available to their loyal members without charging them a premium? Surely this goes against the club ethos.
    • austernperle

      austernperle

      | Profile |
      I do think the same way. It's the second year now since I'm a member. And this tool was the reason that I payed for another year. There are so many people outthere...they sharing the templates and plugins without paying for it. But we are members and we are paying and I really think, that we not supposed to pay again for the ZOO-edition. I hope you will think about it
      • Simon

        Simon

        |
        I Second this - "membership license gives you the right to use any templates or any other products" so how come there is suddenly a fee to use a certain product? Watch out everyone perhaps we will find that next months template will only be available to members IF we pay an additional fee....

        Don't think about it, but rather keep to the contract agreement!
        • austernperle

          austernperle

          | Profile |
          DITO !!!
          • I agree -- I just signed up for another subscription, hoping / assuming ZOO would be part of the YooTools, like all the others. Apparently not -- very disappointing.
  • Quazar

    Quazar

    |
    Wow... I too was under the impression that the Plat sub was going to include Zoo, considering you marketed and talked about it on the same site as all your other tools, which as Tjaard said, "The Platinum membership license gives you the right to use any templates or any other products on unlimited sites."...
  • Quazarr

    Quazarr

    |
    I just read one of steffan's replies and I have a question... If I understand your response to the GPL question, are you saying that when it comes to FUNCTIONALITY, there is nothing missing in the lite version? The difference comes in Joomla Templates that are created to use ZOO to its max capacity?
  • jacob.whitaker

    jacob.whitaker

    | Profile |
    However you guys decide to set the pricing for the ZOO extension I would really like to see an all inclusive membership for the templates, tools, and ZOO. I completely understand the cost behind the development of an extension like this but please at least make it easier with regards to having to manage only one membership as opposed to many.

    Keep up the good work and I look forward to the ZOO release! So what is meant by 'shortly'? This seemingly implies sometime today or tomorrow or are we talking weeks still?

    Best Regards,
    Jake
  • CoolCactus

    CoolCactus

    |
    Yootheme first of all let me say that I love the products and level of service that you provide, but to say I am disappointed with announcement that club members will have to pay extra for Zoo is an understatement.

    I think that you know that this is not the right way forward and notice that you have now changed your terms of use 20 mins ago they read “the right to use any templates or any other products” and now they read “gives you the right to use any template” so does this mean that we will have to start paying for modules as well?

    This is a big mistake on your part and what you have to think about is will the short term gains (and they will be short term) be able to offset the long term losses. Just think about revenue generated from a one off purchase as opposed to a membership package. I also think that other Joomla template clubs will use this move against you.

    • CoolCactus

      CoolCactus

      |
      I personally don’t think you can be a membership club and charge extra for the best bits. I think the way to move forward with Zoo would be to completely remove it from the Yootheme site and market it under a different brand as a purely paid for component (this way it will not damage the Yootheme brand). Alternatively you could include it in the membership packages and if that means putting the cost of membership up then so be it.

      Come on Yootheme do the right thing and don’t disappoint your members
  • sacha

    sacha

    |
    ZOO is for animals but not only for fish ? And we are waiting for zoo very soon ! i hope you will tell to your members that the price was an april 1 joke ?
  • Patrick

    Patrick

    |
    I completely agree. YooTheme should build a commercial and pricing policy that respect his club's members. I have not renewed my subscription yet, waiting for the Zoo release, an now, I'm wondering if I will renew...
    • Facundo

      Facundo

      |
      Same Here!
  • james.pinto

    james.pinto

    | Profile |
    I was just sure that since I had a subscription to YooTheme that I was going to get Zoo (Pro) along with that, I am VERY disappointed that this is not the case. If you do decide to keep that license model, I really think that you need to remove all Zoo references from YooTheme.com and provide Zoo via a completely separate website, since having components on a club site, that don't apply to the club membership could get really annoying.
  • Swimming Pool

    Swimming Pool

    |
    What da... ? 99USD! I thought it will be free for all Club Members ... Bill Clinton would say: "How dare you ?"
    • Jason

      Jason

      |
      Actually, it's 99 Euros, which is around $129 US dollars at the moment.
  • Obviously this component represents hundreds of hours over and above what Yootheme already put into developing their templates and other plugins. The benefits and value you'll get from this plugin are worth more than 99 euros. I've been charging clients hundreds (in some cases thousands of dollars) to develop custom components which we can do in no time with Zoo. I'll happily pay the money.
    • Jacob

      Jacob

      |
      I would have to agree with you 100%. I just hope they keep the membership simplified as possible regardless of how much the extension costs.

      Keep up the good work YOOTheme. :-)
    • Stick

      Stick

      |
      I understand this but watch out! With 69€ you could have JoomSuite, that accomplish pretty the same task of Zoo. Moreover it got complete and skinnable frontend editing, a feature about I asked for information here on the comment tree for the last two months but... no reply! Nothing. I'm pretty sure it won't be an option with Zoo!

      What I liked about Zoo was it's GPL license. JoomSuite has a closed-source crypted with IonCube and this could be a real drawback, but I never saw such a stable, solid and powerful extension as JS is.
      So if templates and extensions won't be GPL, what kind of license will apply to them?

      Surely, I really thank YooTheme to release the Lite edition free of charge. It is for sure a great gift to the world. But lack of information about missing features, closed Pro license and no discount for current members is really not competing with other options.
      Pro License means 99$ PER SITE... it's 1.5 times JoomSuite Resources and it's exactly the JS Resources+Community bundle... I would rather something like Theme Club payment model: as long as I pay, I could get updates, zoo-templates and zoo-extensions, but I could use ALL of them, at my wish.
      This way there is very little reason to switch to Zoo Pro, to me.

      Sorry for hard words, I'm a little disappointed...
  • jeremy.corkin

    jeremy.corkin

    | Profile |
    I'm not impressed and will unlikely re-new my yootheme subscription. It's not that I don't appreciate Zoo and the effort that has gone in to it but the fact that you have marketed it to the club as a new tool and now at the last minute informed us it will cost extra and then quickly altered your terms and conditions to suit your new pricing plan. Great plugin but unethical behaviour to loyal subscribers.
  • This is odd. I think YOO is doing an amazing job in offering great templates and great extensions. Ever since ZOO was announced I have always thought that it was likely that it would be offered in a lite and pro version. YOO have every right to recoup part of their substantial investment by charging for a fully-fledged component. And they are still offering a free version to all and sundry. Maybe they should only offer the free version to club members? Either way, I am still looking forward to messing around with the free version soon! Cheers
    • austernperle

      austernperle

      | Profile |
      ...but this is the second time that YOO act a way I don't like and don't really understand. In the beginning of 2008 they changed the prices for subscription without giving a message to their members. I was surprised when I renew my membership. I emailed but no answer. And now this...the Zoo-Edition is placed between the other module änd plugins and so a lot of people must think, that all extensions are free with a membership. It really makes me mad. I would like to see more infos from the distributer (sorry for my bad english)
  • mustaq

    mustaq

    |
    Looking through some of the comments here, it's clear that there was some level of misunderstanding regarding the distribution of the ZOO extension. To put the question of the price for the Pro version into context just think of the level of work that went into this extension, it would have been released a long time ago but to really add value to the extension, YOOtheme put all their resources and more into ensuring that ZOO would be the most versatile Content Management tool out there.

    If I look at some extentions that are merely used to display content/images in a fancy way and that sell for 25 Euros and compare it to ZOO's capabilities I see the price issue in a whole different light. ZOO does not even fall into the category of an "extension" because it's much more than that. It opens up whole new possibilities for Web Designers working with Joomla to really push Joomla to the max. It's an almost All in One solution for deploying Content rich sites.

    There are extenions as unique as ZOO is, that go for far more than 99 Euros and are more in the region of 160Euros. I agree that 99 Euros is a lot of money for most ( over 1200ZAR for me ) but it would be money well spent. Also in my opinion ZOO's full potential will be seen more on complex sites or sites that are heading in that direction , in other words, I would'nt be using ZOO on my families 40 member website but on clients business and commercial projects.
  • vdrover

    vdrover

    | Profile |
    It is upsetting to see so many folks complaining about the proposed pricing for ZOO. Like you, I paid for a template club. I agreed to the terms at the beginning, understanding that I was getting access to templates.

    What does any of that have to do with the release of an application? If the YOO theme devs start a fruit stand tomorrow, will you expect free fruit because you have a template club membership?

    Let's be realistic here folks. If the Joomla market will bear the price of a 99 euro extension, then so be it. Don't like the price? Then get 10 folks together, pay $10 each, and sell it yourself. Or don't! Just share it amongst yourselves. Or better yet, if you think it's worth the price, buy it and use it for yourself, and renew your membership as necessary.

    The only think you should not do is expect something for nothing. This is the problem that plagues open source communities: the mistaken impression that GPL means "no cost". If you want long term support and product development, it needs to be paid for (either in $$ or donated man-hours). If that offends you, stick with the core joomla extensions and write everything else yourself. I guarantee you that contracting custom programming will be closer to 99 euro per hour.

    If the YOO theme folks had just released this as an extension, not attached to this web site, I bet there would be no issue. Many folks are paying $150 for JomSocial and do so happily. Why should ZOO be different (especially if it is as powerful as it seems).
    • dean.brady

      dean.brady

      | Profile |
      Right on Victor... I'm almost laughing over this... There is obviously two groups of members here. One is used to app development, and uses tools from YT to build sites for customers. The other group is here to get templates and probably do sites as a hobby or side thing. No problem with either. But to think that you get free access to ANYTHING that YT builds is crazy. I also belong to RocketTheme (great group of guys) and when they came out with their PHPBB template club, I didn't whine about getting free access. It's a whole new product. I paid for (and get) access to templates and associated modules.. period.

      Guys, give YT a round of applause for taking the time to build what should be a kick butt app for us! And then shell out the $$ and use it to make more money.. $129? If it saves me a hour of work, it's paid for itself...

      I would like to see a developer license though... hint hint...
      • vdrover

        vdrover

        | Profile |
        And there is a free version. I have hardly heard anyone say "Thanks for the free version".
        • Tom T

          Tom T

          |
          That is a very fair point in actual fact. But as there is a free versiona nd a pro version what are the differences and restrictions in the free version compared to the pro version?

          Yoo logo plastered on it, or features disabled etc. Thats something worth knowing...
          • vdrover

            vdrover

            | Profile |
            Yes, I think this will be revealed when they launch.
          • Tom T

            Tom T

            |
            Perhaps as a method to settle the crowds in this debate it may be an idea to outline the differences beforehand?

            That way it may turn out there is nothing to get annoyed about or otherwise? Ah well.
  • mjc22131

    mjc22131

    |
    Ok, Here is my take on this whole thing. I own a business and we develop applications and websites all the time and we are actually going g to be using Yoo theme templates on many of our new clients in industries that are very unique. I paid for the Yoo platinum membership because I wanted unlimited access to templates and tools. I understand cost of business and resources that are allocated must be recouped. So I have no problem with paying for the extension. However i do though have an issue with a site limitation! That is one thing I can't stand in the Joomla community when developers say "well you can only use it on one site." I want to use Yoo items on hundreds of sites so this is now a much more costly route than 99 euros. You want to charge fine, but the site restriction must go!!

    Now I believe it should only go though to anyone who doesn't have a platinum membership. Allowing only your platinum people unlimited site licenses is not going to hurt you as you membership base is not solely platinum members. Your members that aren't platinum, fine use the site restriction as they have one already on templates, this will not upset them. But platinum members are so because they are mostly business oriented. You must see this aspect and change. I will pay for this extension but will not use it again until it can be used on multiple sites. Paying you 99 euros per site is ludicrous. I thank you for your time.
    • per.torstensson

      per.torstensson

      | Profile |
      If you cannot justify the cost of euro 99 for a component that does most - if not all - of your work, I think you seriously should consider changing your line of work. Cheap remarks like this, and others similar above, never stop to amaze me.

      I seriously think that this cheapness is the only thing that will seriously threat the Open Source acceptance in general. At least proprietary software vendors know how to get paid - and thereby survive in the long run. Immensely saddening that the same reason - the proprietary aspect - makes them sloppy, lazy and overly expensive...and not to forget the lock-in effect you pay a premium for at the same time...
      • mjc22131

        mjc22131

        |
        I am not worried about the money, as I said brfore I understand they must be paid/1 I am unhappy with site restriction! I have stated that many times before, obviously you didn't read my post. They should be paid for the work they did, but don't restrict my use. I have a successful business so I won't change my line of work.
  • vdrover

    vdrover

    | Profile |
    The site restriction cannot be legally enforced under the GPL, though domain restriction can be legally implemented into the codebase as long as the code is not encrypted (which essentially makes domain restriction useless).

    In any case, it sounds like it's only the templates that will be domain restricted as images and such can legally be non-GPL. The easy solution then is to not use the copyrighted templates on more than one domain.
  • mjc22131

    mjc22131

    |
    Yeah I have the platinum account so i can use templates on as many as I want but they said that you couldonly install ZOO on one domain. That is a big problem. Could I just use it anyway as much as I want? Yes! But I am a business man and respect this community so I won't unless they allow it. I won't be happy though.
  • vdrover

    vdrover

    | Profile |
    Commercial developers will have a major incentive to be GPL as they can be listed on the JED after July 1. Apparently the YOO devs value this more than setting up a complicated encrypted solution. The consequence then is that it is not LEGAL for them to restrict your use. I respect you paying for every site, but in my mind it's like a car company saying I can't change the tires on my own car. It is illegal for them to suggest this. Now, if they want to not support my car (i.e. warranty) after I modify it, then that is their choice. But in this case, I am paying for warranty. So do i risk losing the warranty coverage? Depends on the cost to change the tires ;)
    • mjc22131

      mjc22131

      |
      I agree. I have always had great experiences with Yoo theme so hopefully it all works out.
  • mjc22131

    mjc22131

    |
    Yeah this is such a curve ball I think.
  • Sentinel

    Sentinel

    |
    I think it could be right if YOOtheme gives better opportunities to your members. For example, allow Plat member to use full ZOO licence without domain limits and allow other memebers to purchase full ZOO licence at a low cost. In this way we can respect their works and they can respect our loyal membership!
    • vdrover

      vdrover

      | Profile |
      And how do you determine a loyal member? Do first time platinum members qualify? What about all the extensions you already get with your platinum membership? Are they worthless now? I am afraid to think what you all will say if the template membership rates go up.
  • Sentinel

    Sentinel

    |
    You're right: I made a mistake, using the term "loyal". I think it could be enough to be a member!
    Maybe my proposal was confusing, so I make it simple:
    - Platinum members can use ZOO without paying.
    - Other members can use ZOO paying a low cost (I think it coul be right a 50% off),or they can choose to upgrade their membership.
    - Only the no-members have to pay the full price.
    Otherwise, in my opinion, ZOO couldn't appear in the YOOtheme site like others products. And the expectations they created in the members during the last weeks are betrayed.
  • multitainment

    multitainment

    | Profile |
    I think the whole debate about pricing is just stupid. They make an extension that everyone wants to use, they put a lot of effort in it; let the developer then get paid for it as well! Why doe everyone wants everything for free?

    I don't have any problem with the costs, only with the site limitation. Make it 50 USD more expensive en remove the site limitation!
    • ...."Why doe everyone wants everything for free? "
      it's not free for members: I have payed 249€ for Platinium membership who terms says "templates, tools and any other products"
      IT'S NOT ETHIC / LEGAL TO CHANGE THE TERMS OF CONTRACT AFTER PAYING
      And more: At the beginin of talking about the magnificent Zoo here (who nobody know yet), yootheme should have informed before and less "super-component" and "the missing cck.." and "...The swiss army knife ..."
      In other words: The members are also supporter in past, current & future dev during his periods, and more for the platinium members without limitation in use with "templates, tools and any other products".
      • I forgot to say that comparing with other payment solutions in market, now I find Patinuim (or other) memebership is a lot expensive, considering what we get: a monthly tamplate that might never we use and tools that are not updated & bugfix in months.
        And now, thinking that a zoo could compensate & offset the payment, it is quite frustrating this "news".
  • I think the debates come due to the "improper" marketing strategy.

    First, ZOO was announced as a new extension in yootheme.com. On the other hand, the t&C states that members can use all the templates and extensions. (but it had been changed now *_*).

    To me the tease is a bit too long and some of the member may fall into this "unpredicted trap". My platinum membership was due in DEC 2008. However, I'm visiting yootheme.com regularly because of the tease. I think better I decide it after there's a clear cut from YOO.
  • punchdrunklove

    punchdrunklove

    | Profile |
    Yes it was a marketing mistake, i hope they will reduce the price for there members. But at least 99 euro for a component like this is OK, not good but acceptable ... You all know that.
  • Del

    Del

    |
    I am just a little bit disappointed for the delay between the announce and the release.

    I've found weird the choice to strongly advertise the component for more than two months without giving info about pricing and/or release date.

    I have renewed my 3 months subscriptions just to have a CCK solution: now my subscription is almost over and I have to pay for the (complete) CCK as everyone else.

    Anyway I am still waiting for the component cause I really need it, and I leave the discussions about prices, GPL and related stuff to the experts.
  • Nikos

    Nikos

    |
    Hello everyone, i want to extend my appreciation to the yootheme developers for the efforts to propose a new tool. Personally Im going to try first the free option and if it meets my needs with no doubt 99$ worth spending for the Pro features.

    What i want to ask is if it would be possible to transfer from one Catalog System (i.e Mosets Tree) to Zoo? In our website we have more that 750 articles and im wondaring if it could be happen.
  • goldeagle

    goldeagle

    | Profile |
    Hey all,
    Im new to the Yoo community and been taking my time getting the bearings. Ive only followed the progress of Zoo for as long as ive been a member, but there are some things now that concern me.
    Above someone pointed out that the terms and conditions were altered on the sign up page. Traditionally any company changing their terms and conditions may do so giving you a reasonable amount of notice to either agree or disagree with the new terms. I didnt get an email or anything?

    Also though from the terms it says
    "The .... membership license gives you the right to use any template on .... sites. The .... membership expires after ..... months". So where does that leave me with the tools and modules etc? As the terms now clearly state you are ONLY licensed to use termplates?

    The other bit that bugs me is that someone mentioned man hours put in and support etc etc. I suppose we could have a full blown out debate about all of this really, but the 99 Euros dont forget then has to have 19% tax on it. So this now becomes something in the region of 118 Euros unless you can provide a VAT number (which I cannot as I dont make enough to be VAT registered in our country). So im looking at a higher cost, should I wish to use zoo pro, and it is actually one of the reasons I didnt go for the Plat package as this would be 249 + 19% so 300 Euros almost.

    Yoo have openly stated that there is no formal support from them as such and that they would only "Try" and do their best. So this 99 Euros for 3 months after your intial purchase then is only to be able to access the forusm, unless you buy a new license everytime, that you cant sell on without Yoo's permission.

    All in all I guess a good way would be to either keep it seperate as someone mentioned above, or better still why not do this?

    Silver = templates on 1 site + Tools + yoo lite (x1)
    Gold= templates for 3 sites + Tools + 1 x zoo pro(1 site)
    Plat = templates for unlimited sites + tools + 5 x zoo pro(5 sites)
    additional zoo pro license per site = 99 Euros.
  • Dangerousal

    Dangerousal

    |
    I was thinking that the forthcoming zoo component would be great value for a platinum membership, I'm gobsmacked at the news that I will have to pay again to use it, this is my first year as a platinum member, and this news will make me re-evaluate re-subscribing
  • zorroh

    zorroh

    |
    what a heck is zoo??? anyone talkinga about it, but what is zoo?
  • benny.kristensen

    benny.kristensen

    | Profile |
    Yootheme tools is the best, and best supported.
    You can get the Lite edition, and if you need more, it is for business use, and then you have to pay.
    You can't get it all for nothing, and you even don't know what you get until Zoo is released.
    Be happy for the tools all the Yootheme folks deliver to you.
    • Del

      Del

      |
      Personally I am not sure about the" best suppoort".
      Try to post in th forum, wait the answer from the team and look how much time is gone...

      BTW Yoo tools and templates are great for sure.
  • Martyn

    Martyn

    |
    Guys, Without frontend loading this is useless and as they have stated it will not come in the first stable, I have now opted to go with Joomsuite as this is a complete unite and the prices are very small. I think for the most part this has been drawen out too long, really built up the hype and then not delivered.
  • Phil

    Phil

    |
    I do also agree, that 99 EUR is a fair price, if that makes the combination Joomla+ZOO more comparable against other products. I also do agree, that - if you use it e. g. for a customer - it's okay, because most of the time, you charge much more than that. I see that it will be a huge application framework, which may be overdesigned for a personal website. To compare it, I would not install the Intershop application, if I have only 5 products. I think I will buy a PRO license, just to build an example application for future customers.

    BUT (here it comes): Think please, please, please about the limited access to the ZOO forums (3 months if I didn't misunderstand). That would be a reason for me, not to buy it. As I am working actually part time on web projects, it's too short. A year subscription ( which then still is limited) would be a better solution I think
  • yi.wen.chen

    yi.wen.chen

    | Profile |
    Just for reference, Joomsuite Resources is a great, albeit complex, alternative CCK for J 1.5. Yes, YooTheme needs a new marketing director, but let's see the finished product before we get our panties in a bunch.
  • waitz

    waitz

    |
    I am very much looking forward to the extension. I need something which can expand the way of publishing in Joomla, and if Zoo is good, I have no problems in paying for it. And I will continue being a yootheme member. Of course it would be nice with a discount for members, or the option to try zoo before buying. But the most important is to expand Joomla with quality, and my experience with the work that Yoo does, is that it is high quality. And that I support!
  • fan club

    fan club

    |
    yes, yes, yes.
    I like that it will be a free version because i don`t think I have enought money for the pro one, yet
  • Tom T

    Tom T

    |
    But there in lay the problem you see. Unless you make it a closed source code and use domain checks this wouldnt work.
    By allowing people to download it for updates there is a chance people would abuse this system and use it on multiple sites.

    I just think the forum access/support side of it is extremely unfair as you would be expected to pay $396 Euros a year for support which for me isnt far from £375 per year...
  • Simon W

    Simon W

    |
    Does anyone remember the comment from their first blog explaining what this was going to be "Expect something like the current YOOtheme memberships"? So, what would we be expecting? I agree with some other posters though that it should perhaps be released under a different brand/website etc and changing the terms is a little naughty.

    I am looking forward to the release and I hope for the extra 99 there are a lot of decent templates and extra elements. I would also hope the frontend submissions feature is added very soon!
  • D DAY

    D DAY

    |
    The day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! when will be the release day?
  • Wendi

    Wendi

    |
    Wow--I thought we would at least get a discount for the Zoo release as members of Yoo theme. At the very least could we get a localhost copy of the Pro version for free. It would be nice to let members at least try it for free and see if it would work for them.
  • Wendi

    Wendi

    |
    Additionally since it looks like you are going to hook on a 3month template subscription to the Zoo release-why don't you just subtract the 3 month template subscription form the cost for existing members--since we already have the templates or add on 3 months of templates to our existing subscription.
  • dean.brady

    dean.brady

    | Profile |
    So why does everyone choose to only post the part of the Platinum membership that makes them look right?

    "Each described membership gives you the right to use YOOtheme templates on as many sites (means Joomla! installations, NOT domains) as described in 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3." That's from 2007... and it still reads the same today....

    - RIGHT TO USE YOOTHEME TEMPLATES"....

    This could be written better however, it's pretty clear that it's for templates.... Stop whining...

    As for the value of the developer membership - Most other template sites are in the same range. RocketTheme is $240, Shape5 is $225, the list goes on. You get unlimited use... good deal of you make a living this way.

    YOOTheme - guys, I would suggest you re-write that section or make an entirely new area (which I think you have already) for "Apps" like Zoo. Also, if you really want the dev members to get behind this, you need a non-site restricted license for them. I will agree with everyone on that. It's ok to have it restricted for some, but you need a "site license" model where I can buy it and use it wherever I want.

    Please?
  • Lisa C

    Lisa C

    |
    I think everyone is upset that YOOTheme is taking care of new customers without taking care of existing customers. I think that paying 99 Euros for an application is not that expensive. It is no different than paying Microsoft for more than 1 license for MS Office.

    If you have a 3 month membership that is expired or about to expire, let it lapse, pay the 99 Euros and get the Zoo PLUS 3 more months of membership for free.

    I also think that the way they marketed it was misleading. I personally was waiting to see if it was going to be a member extension.

    I like YOOTheme products and I hope they are listening to their EXISTING customers.
  • ash

    ash

    |
    All this sounds great a free version and a paid version , personally i don’t mind paying the 99euro but not for every website, this would mean i hike in my costs and charging clients, which may opt then for another company as we have had to add a futher 99euro to the price.

    If there are updates then why not charge us 10 euro for these updates, as long as they are valid and updates of significance say once a quarter, instead of the 99 euro for every site, you may find in the long term it breaks even as more people buy the component than being put off that they can only use it once. just a thought ?:)

    Still i have spent some time reading the comments, and there are a lot of valid points, one stuck out more than others about separate fees/membership for this component, which reminds me allot like Joomlart, i joind their club, then they brought out some good extensions, and decided to have an extensions club, separate to the template club. so now you need two memberships , now they have started to create magento templates, another membership fee is required to use these templates, so that is one company that has broken down its business to charge members three times, to use what was once one club, the question here is, is Yootheme going to go down the same path.
  • mjc22131

    mjc22131

    |
    Paying forit is acceptable but platinum members should not have a site restriction!!! Period! Charge what you want but remove the site restriction. I am going to use this on many sites and are not interested in charging my clients an extra 99 euros which in America is like 129.00. You put in the development time and labor, and should be paid for it, but don't restrict my use. If this isn't changed I will not re up my membership and continue elsewhere.

    Plus I don't even know how you can enforce a site restriction, I hate companies that do this in the joomla community. Sound like Microsoftism to me.
  • jasonthemcclain

    jasonthemcclain

    | Profile |
    What a fun thread! Hah! I would be willing to bet that those complaining have never owned their own business. Never brought a product to market. Never dumped all of their resources into something and hoped the investment paid off.

    Zoo is a whole different animal [no pun intended, but I'll take it] than the other offerings here that are part of the club. The fruit stand is an *excellent* metaphor for what is happening here.

    Having said that, Yoo could have done a much better job anticipating the shock and communicating in advance with a bit of mindfulness to how this may have upset people. But this is not a business mistake per se [I mean, it is nowadays, but not a technical problem with their offering. And those of you who bought the club for ZOO, well, I think I would have asked to verify that to be sure.

    These are the best themes and modules out there. Where you gonna go? I mean Rocket is great if you are into that style.

    Give you their due, do not begrudge them their Zoo rollout. Heh.
    • mjc22131

      mjc22131

      |
      I am not begrudging them and in fact I own an inventory management company in south Florida. We do web development for the automotive industry. I understand recouping the money spent on development and such. I understand business very well. I stated that they should be paid for the product, but should not have any site restrictions. I am ok with the money but not site restrictions.
      • Tom T

        Tom T

        |
        Ah but the site restrictions part can swing a number of ways. I mean you dont buy an XP license and expect to roll it out on every machne you own for no additional cost do you ?

        Dont get me wrong. I am with you in terms that (and I dont know if this is something for me and my site yet, who knows) after the initial payment of 99 Euros for the 1 site you only get 3 months of limited support and after that it will cost you 99 Euros for every additional 3 months.

        I mean I cannot talk too much as im only on Silver at present, until I see just how much of the templates I can use for other sites etc, but perhaps offering as I mentioned in a previous post, a couple of licenses for existing subscriptions may be a way to entice people to use it more and so get a better response.

        EG
        Silver - Only Free
        Gold - 1 Zoo Pro
        Plat - 5 Zoo Pro's

        Plus as your mainly buying the license for a site why not give each additonal 6 months at say 20 Euros or 1 year access to updates and forums for 30 Euros. Ok, this is a fair bit lower than the current to be 396 Euros a year (er ok by 366 Euros) but think long term. People would be happier to renew at the lower cost and less likely to make do without.

        Only my 2 pence worth.
        • dean.brady

          dean.brady

          | Profile |
          I really don't understand the issue here with the site restriction and that may be because I haven't had a chance to see what I can do with the tool. I see 2 scenarios here:

          1. You buy it to use on your own site. One site - no problem.
          2. You but it to use on multiple sites that you build as a developer. I hope you are getting paid for doing this work, which in turn allows you to spend money on the tool if it is in fact helping you develop the site.

          Part of the problem here is that web apps are a new beast. I don't have to pay Adobe to use Dreamweaver or Photoshop for every site I build. Then again, they weren't $99 :-). I know of a number of other apps, utilities etc that I have to pay for to use each time. I have software that was $50,000 and requires a hardware key (HASP - nastiest form of licensing ever invented)

          This is all about utility. Do you get value out of what you purchase that is more than what you are paying. If so, it's a good deal. If not, it's not a good deal. Pretty simple.

          YOOTheme. The ONE thing you need to really listen to here is the roll out. I've launched hardware and software products for more than 20 years... you guys blew this one... Great to let the cat out of the bag early but you did nothing to let people know how it was going to be sold and I think there are a LOT of customers that renewed their membership just to get ZOO. The same goes for developers.... You might want to think about offering current members a discount etc...

          My recommendation: (For any members that had a valid membership the day you announced ZOO)

          - Platinum Members = Pro license (multi site)
          - Gold Members = 1 Pro License
          - Silver Members = 50% off Pro license.

          Just as an introduction to get it out and in use....
          • vdrover

            vdrover

            | Profile |
            I think it's disingenuous to suggest that people would renew based on the potential release of a product that has not seen the light of day. If I did that for every vaporware announcement, I'd be broke pretty fast.
  • Tony

    Tony

    |
    I have a simple answer - to charge a different premium for it, then sell via another site. At no point during th hype has a new membership fee been mentioned. How many new members have joined in that period in the assumption this would be included?
    • Tom T

      Tom T

      |
      Well I joined because of the existing great themes and tools. But I would be telling lies if I said I was very interested to find out about Zoo also.
      • Tony

        Tony

        |
        I agree that there were a great range of themes and tools, however these have become dated of late and the reasons listed were the development work being undertaken on ZOO. Therefore the members have suffered lower quality products with no outcome - after all I would accept it assuming I got access to ZOO which was both implied and is now not the case, a blatant disregard for the current members I am sorry to say.
        • Tom T

          Tom T

          |
          Well I cannot really debate with you on that point as I have only been here about a month. The only place I could possibly agree with you is if you meant that support for existing products was slow and also hit and miss?

          This I would agree with and am wondering daily how quick / easily I could actually resolve an issue if I had one based on what ive witnessed so far (although im still waiting for someone to come back to me about an issue with the compliancy on Beyond lol).

          I suppose if I am copletely truthful, at the moment I am not in a position to buy Zoo, for various reasons really. But the kick int he teeth for me is the tax. The exchange rate today was 1.01 Euros to the £. Meaning I would have paid £99 + 19% Tax so £119 in effect. and the only way for me to claim that back is by being VAT registered? I dont make £64000 a year or more in what I do but the tax break would be neat. Or call it 99 Euros after tax ?
    • jdmcclain

      jdmcclain

      |
      Agreed. I will say it was inelegent and a little sloppy [and if I were them I might offer a refund to those who said already in writing they bought the club FOR Zoo, but that is just smart business. I do not expect that tho--smart business that is. Just seeing both sides--the upset expectations from a reasonable assumption it would be included in the club on one side, and the clarity that it is not a theme/module kind of thing and what it took to get it written on the other.



      Poor execution though, indeed. And I think it WAS a reasonable expectation it was included. Again, just seeing both sides.



      Where is the developer license if it is all that on commercial site building?
  • patrick.mouyade

    patrick.mouyade

    | Profile |
    I understand that zoo is not just a simple module but a component. It has needed more work but if we compare the prices of yootheme membership, with and without zoo, we can see that :

    yoo template and tools - 1 site - 3 months subscribing =)> 39 € and with zoo it's 99 €/3 months

    so if they keep their prices policy as we all know till then, it could be

    yoo template and tools - 3 sites - 12 months subscribing =)> 79 € and so 199 €/year
    yoo template and tools - unlimited sites - 12 months subscribing =)> 249 € or 625 €/year

    I'd be ready to pay those prices only if there is an access to all new components made by Yootheme in the future.

    Best regards
  • Rex

    Rex

    |
    "...99EUR... updates and the forum for 3 months."
    3 months seem VERY SHORT in my opinion. I guess there will be many updates, and new features in the future. What happens after the 3 month? What is the price tag for an update or another access period???
  • Del

    Del

    |
    Just thinking that 99€ for the pro version could be almost fair but if you want the front-end integration (already planned) you have to wait probably more than 3 months and spend 99€ more, and that is not so fair...

    PS: When ZOO will be relased? March is ending, and two post ago Sascha said that was the last post about it... I am waiting, as I said in my deleted comment my customers have another concept of "soon"...
    • mustaq

      mustaq

      |
      ZOO was put through some thorouh testing and there were many add ons built in so the package can be more versatile, hence the time delay in releasing it before this was all done. You won't have to wait much longer though
  • James Hall

    James Hall

    |
    Seems to me if the license is only for 3 months of support and updates, a lot of people (myself included) will hold off even thinking about purchasing a pro license when the component is released since there is likely to be a lot of changes and updates withint the first 6 months to a year of release.

    My main issue with this pricing structure is that for me, Yootheme support has been quite sporadic. Don't get me wrong, I love the templates, and many of the tools are really useful. But support and bug fixes for them is often a long time coming...
    • mustaq

      mustaq

      |
      The ZOO has been thoroughly tested and the release package should be flawless. Please point me to the template "bugs" you found via a PM on the Forum.
  • Mindriot

    Mindriot

    |
    I'm still a little confused as to what people mean when they are calling ZOO a TRUE CCK? I am currently playing around with the JReviews , and it seems to do everything ZOO is going to do but without the limitations of the J core Section and categories. Can someone give a lament terms example of what I'm really going to be able to accomplish with this Component. I"m torn between waiting for this compnent or jsut pulling the trigger on JReviews. Jreviews seems very powerful and it has JomSocial integration which is a huge selling point.
    • mustaq

      mustaq

      |
      You won't have wait too long, A little patience will pay off. The new ZOO site will have alot of info etc that you can base your decisions on after conducting your research..
      • Tony

        Tony

        |
        Still teasing - don't you read the comments? Give the answers now before your EX-loyal customers desert you in droves or does that just prove that you don't care about the customers??
        • PunshDrunkLove

          PunshDrunkLove

          |
          "You won't have wait too long"
          Tony, Patience is a goodness ...
  • ash

    ash

    |
    something is on the way as the zoo site just gives me a blank page http://zoo.yootheme.com/ whoo bring it on
    might hold of buying it though until the the reviews come in and poeple find all the bugs
  • timothyfrancis

    timothyfrancis

    | Profile |
    Some of you people need to put down the cough mixture or whatever it is that you are on. I am a professional. I am a pimp. I pimp other peoples skill sets and guess what?

    If you don't pay them don't produce. If they don't produce I don't have things to pimp.

    Seriously - if Steffan gets the monkeys in this Zoo to perform you will be paying peanuts. Take a walk outside and have a look at what the real world pays for this kind of stuff; and I'm just talking about the mans' templates.

    I just want it now - but if it ain't ready it ain't ready.

    Shut the front door.


    timothyfrancis
    • Sentinel

      Sentinel

      |
      I think it's right to pay but it isn't right to treat a member of a club the same way of whoever else.
  • sofia.karakasidou

    sofia.karakasidou

    | Profile |
    We will sure need a ZOO demo-test server by the way...
  • Fernando S.

    Fernando S.

    |
    Automatic translation:

    Neither one nor the other end ... should charge 99 € for one years subscription to the zoo with their updates, but separated because of Yootheme in this case should be included in the price they already pay annually. Around 99 € per Joomla is crazy and what you get is that nobody uses it. I am also disappointed with the decision.
  • michpeta

    michpeta

    |
    yes. Up until about 5 hours ago it was advertised on the Zoo page as the so called Super Component.
    • flyingvlad

      flyingvlad

      |
      thank you Michpeta, for your comment that make me believe I was right even if the "administrator" erased my post. My post was polite and honest, only mentioning that from January 13 to March 16 "Zoo" was advertised as a component for all yootheme members...
      I still raise my thumb up for the YT team and the quality of its products in general.
  • sascha

    sascha

    | Profile |
    Hi everybody, we will post an official statement and the release date of the ZOO in the next minutes on your blog....
  • Peter

    Peter

    |
    JoomlaWorks just released a beta of a Joomla-Component called K2. It has the same functionality as ZOO and it is really FREE!!!

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.